Single Supplier Framework Agreement

12 Apr

Framework agreements allow a contracting authority to enter into longer-term agreements with more than one supplier and, in some cases, with suppliers for a number of industries. In public procurement, it is customary for a buyer to require a number of services; A good example of a framework agreement would be a municipality that seeks to obtain work in progress and divides a framework into lots such as roof, scaffolding, general construction, etc., in order to conclude an agreement with specialized companies without constantly entering the market. In theory, this should also benefit other supply chains over a guaranteed period of time. 4. In the 2015 regulations, the requirement that the attribution criteria must be narrowly based on those of the framework agreement in a mini-competition is stronger. In 2006, it was formulated that the criteria for awarding “on the basis of the framework agreement” must be stated “on the basis” of the contract documents (which establishes attribution criteria for appeals under the framework that differ from those used for the tender). After 2015, the text is that the criteria for attribution must be defined in the market documents “for” the framework agreement. 2. Where a framework agreement includes both direct allocation and mini-competition, the framework agreement must include objective criteria for determining the method to be applied and when (see Regulation 33, paragraph 9, point a). I would have said that this has always been the case, but most of the club executives I meet seem to assume that the client has free choice about it. As in the past, contracting authorities must issue notices when a framework agreement is reached. However, there are some subtle changes from the 2006 PCR: although your company is more likely to be technically successful due to more than one licensed supplier, competition can make success incredibly difficult and you should focus on the award criteria and carefully analyze the purchase documents before launching the tender.

Contracting powers are required to award any contract to the bidder who submitted the best bid based on the award criteria set out in the contract documents for the framework agreement. This latter requirement, which reflects a similar formulation in the 2006 RCP, has raised concerns about the extent to which a contracting power may use different weights, or even different criteria, in its mini-competitions than those defined in the market documents for the framework agreement. Unfortunately, the 2015 RCPs do not clarify this issue. The maximum duration of the framework agreement is 4 years and is defined by the public procurement regulation document (2015). However, your client may set a shorter time frame for your framework agreement. Framework agreements are governed by public contract regulations (2015), which define how contracts are managed. These are the rules of what you and your client must do for the duration of the work for which you are under contract. While the purchasing powerhouse, which is putting in place a framework agreement, Regulation 37 of the PCR 2015 makes it clear that the individual contracting powers that have access to these agreements are responsible for compliance with the 2015 PCR with respect to all parts of the procedure they themselves have implemented, for example. B: The provisions relating to the framework agreements of the Public Procurement Regulation 2015 (PCR 2015) are not radical in the regulations provided for by the Public Procurement Regulations Orders 2006 (PCR).